Does anyone else think yesterday's Supreme Court ruling that "crush videos" (films in which small animals are crushed under a woman's stiletto for the sexual arousal of the viewer) are once again legal has as much to do with the Justices' views on protected free speech as the fact they have no idea how information is currently transmitted?
Forget an ideological litmus test: Obama's upcoming nominee should submit proof of high-speed internet and smartphone use.
No comments:
Post a Comment